Motivation Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words - 2

Motivation - Essay ExampleKeySpan is the surviving entity of a merger between Brooklyn amount of money Gas and Long Island Lighting Company. It was Kenny Moores job to bring together the personnel of the IT departments of the two merging companies. He decided to do it through an open space meeting, wherein the 400 IT staff members would come together to piece topics they would want to discuss in subsequent breakout posings. Initially, the CIO was apprehensive that nobody would suggest any topic, and proposed put topics with the directors in advance to make sure some people came forward. Kenny discouraged this and said it was advance to risk this chance and show the employees that the forethought trusted the process.In the end, some 50 topics for breakout session were proposed, and the breakout sessions were enthusiastically and energetically undertaken, making the open space meeting a huge success. Kenny ascertained that the key to success was the Ownership for a successful mer ger from the hallowed halls of serious management into the cubicles of the prevalent work. He attributed the success to the freedom inherent in a business invitation.A careful referee will note that the word motivation is not used once in this case and yet, the case intelligibly has a lot to say about motivation and how it is managed in the workplace. Use the previously discussed theories to explain why people were motivated.While the word motivation was never used in the case, it was clearly such a case. Management intended for people to perform in a certain manner and act a certain way to yield a particular result. Through the process of the open space meeting, management was able to motivate the people to do just that.There are several motivational theories that whitethorn explain why the process worked. Herein we shall discuss the case from the point of view of four of these theories, for the involvement of conciseness and relevance.McGregors Theory YIn 1960, Douglas McGreg or began a long-standing debate (that incidentally still exists today) with the publication of his volume The Human Side of the Enterprise. He introduced in this work his theory for which he is famously credited, Theory X and Theory Y. Essentially, he posed the question, Could employees be trusted and empowered to do good work, or did they vex to be closely directed, monitored, and controlled to act in the interests of the firm (Kochan et al, 2002, p. 2) Theory X, which is defined as the authoritative management style, posits that employees charter to be closely monitored and controlled. On the other hand, Theory Y, popularly known as the participative management style, answers this with the premiere alternative, that is, that employees, may be counted on to do good work on their own and thus may be empowered to act on their own initiative.Theory Y makes the following assumptions1.Given the